Lisa LaFlamme, CTV News, and Bad Executive Decisions

Former CTV nationwide anchor
Lisa LaFlamme

There will be no bittersweet on-air goodbye for (now previous) CTV nationwide news anchor Lisa LaFlamme, no ceremonial passing of the baton to the subsequent generation, no broadcast retrospectives lionizing a journalist with a storied and award-winning occupation. As LaFlamme introduced yesterday, CTV’s mum or dad corporation, Bell Media, has decided to unilaterally conclusion her deal. (See also the CBC’s reporting of the tale right here.)

While LaFlamme herself does not make this assert, there was of study course quick speculation that the network’s choice has a little something to do with the point that LaFlamme is a girl of a selected age. LaFlamme is 58, which by Television criteria is not accurately young — besides when you review it to the age at which well-known adult men who proceeded her have remaining their respective anchor’s chairs: take into account Peter Mansbridge (who was 69), and Lloyd Robertson (who was 77).

But an even more sinister concept is now afoot: somewhat than mere, shallow misogyny, evidence has arisen of not just sexism, but sexism conjoined with corporate interference in newscasting. Two evils for the price of one! LaFlamme was fired, states journalist Jesse Brown, “because she pushed back in opposition to one Bell Media government.” Brown reviews insiders as professing that Michael Melling, vice president of information at Bell Media, has bumped heads with LaFlamme a range of times, and has a background of interfering with information coverage. Brown additional experiences that “Melling has regularly shown a deficiency of respect for women in senior roles in the newsroom.”

Useless to say, even if a personal grudge additionally sexism describe what is likely on, listed here, it nonetheless will seem to be to most as a “foolish choice,” one confident to bring about the business problems. Now, I make it a coverage not to query the small business savvy of knowledgeable executives in industries I don’t know nicely. And I suggest my pupils not to leap to the summary that “that was a dumb decision” just for the reason that it is a person they really do not realize. But however, in 2022, it’s really hard to consider that the organization (or Melling far more especially) did not see that there would be blowback in this scenario. It’s a single matter to have disagreements, but it is a different to unceremoniously dump a beloved and award-winning girl anchor. And it is strange that a senior government at a information business would imagine that the truth would not arrive out, offered that, soon after all, he’s surrounded by folks whose job, and private dedication, is to report the information.

And it’s difficult not to suspect that this a considerably less than satisfied changeover for LaFlamme’s substitution, Omar Sachedina. Of program, I’m positive he’s satisfied to get the career. But whilst Bell Media’s push launch quotations Sachedina expressing graceful points about LaFlamme, definitely he did not want to suppose the anchor chair amidst common criticism of the changeover. He’s taking on the job underneath a shadow. Potentially the prize is truly worth the selling price, but it is also challenging not to consider that Sachedina had (or now has) some pull, some potential to affect that method of the changeover. I’m not indicating (as some surely will) that — as an insider who knows the true story — he ought to have declined the work as ill-gotten gains. But at the quite minimum, it seems truthful to argue that he should have utilized his impact to shape the changeover. And if the now-senior anchor doesn’t have that type of affect, we should really be nervous without a doubt about the independence of that job, and of that newsroom.

A closing, relevant take note about authority and governance in sophisticated businesses. In any reasonably perfectly-governed firm, the final decision to axe a important, community-going through expertise like LaFlamme would have to have signal-off — or at least tacit acceptance — from extra than one senior govt. This implies that one of two matters is legitimate. Both Bell Media isn’t that kind of nicely-governed corporation, or a huge number of men and women had been associated in, and culpable of, unceremoniously dumping an award-winning journalist. Which is even worse?

Leave a Reply